|
Sep
30/03
Many times we asked
ourselves why there is always a big gap between the
government and the people, especially in Indonesia.
There is a common belief in the country: Either you
are with the government or you are against them, but
there can not be a government for the people. People
have been a passive receiver of government’s policy,
even during the reformation era. The long and
continuing process of inefficient, irresponsive,
ineffective, corrupts governance, in general, will
demoralize the nation’s spirit.
The gap between the
government and the people is actually not a new issue
in the country. It has ever been since the
colonialization era or during the feudal Javanese
society. Civil servants in Indonesia do not really
serve the society but rather are being served by the
society. Even during the development period in the New
Order era, the old feudal society tradition did not
change. And in the reformation era, high ranking
government officials still do not change their
attitude about the ‘exclusiveness’ that they have
enjoyed in the past.
Sadly, the political
elites in the reformation era are still not aware that
– or pretend as if not - the bad governance is one of
the main causes of the social and political regresses
in the country. And to a greater extend, their
attitudes affect the national identity crisis and
national integrity. People no longer trust the
government and the political elites. The government
and its apparatus have failed to generate an
efficient, responsive, effective and a clean
governance. The high echelons of the government and
the legislative members are more worried of how to
maintain their position than how to dedicate their
position for the people. As a result, people become
retreating from the politics.
A continuing distrust
from the people will induce the people to form massive
self-reliant groups. Government is then no longer
needed at least in a small scale and small level of
communities. Like in many remote areas of Indonesia,
people rely more for their security and safety on the
informal and traditional leadership. In many areas,
these strong small communities can be assets to nation
building, but at the same time can be liabilities or
threat to nation building. The government in Jakarta
is so far away and often so unrealistic for their
policy. The failure of the social interaction between
the government and the people will further separate
the people from the government and further motivate
them to form small but yet very strong self-reliant
communities that could jeopardize the nation’s unity.
It is then very
important for the middle class – the social strata
expected to be the buffer of national unity - to
promote and to participate in the creation of good
governance that not only will enhance a strong civic
society but also strengthen the national unity. There
is no need of military intervention in the civic and
democratic state to reorganize the society. People
will feel the national spirit through their ability
and opportunity to participate in the country’s
politics. But the necessary condition is to have an
efficient, effective, responsive, democratic and clean
government that will bring the country out from the
national identity crisis.
Reza Adenan is studying
for International Study in Canada.
Your
comment
Back
to top
|