|
05/12/03
Once
upon a time, I heard this loud and rather impatient
demand from many Indonesians: We want revolution, not
reformation! Well, what kind of revolution?
While both refer to a change, those are two different
things. And to demand for change and to desire for
revolution are often completely two different things.
Those who demand revolution may feel the change they
desire can only be accomplished by a complete
overthrow of government or the replacement of all
existing political and social institutions.
Undeniably, Indonesia badly needs change. We have
moved too slowly in recovering our economy – creating
jobs, eradicating poverty, promoting robust small and
medium scale enterprises, establishing more healthy
financial system and reducing independency on foreign
debts. We have moved too slowly, if not backwardly, in
combating corruption, nepotism and collusion
practices. And we have moved slowly in building
national identity (unity).
But
the foremost solution does not rest in power and
institutions. They are both the vehicles needed to
solve problems. But the drivers, the mechanics, the
road builders, the map drawers, the passengers are all
human beings. All is people. Changing the power and
the institutions with new ones but still employing
people with the same qualities are ineffectual. We
have tried that experiment once with Gus Dur only to
harvest a miserable failure. It was in fact known as
an era of disorder. There is no guarantee that
revolution will succeed in bringing improvements. This
is because in most revolution the name of the game is
power. And power, whether it is gained through
“peaceful” or democratic process, tends to corrupt.
Besides, power is merely a vehicle.
The
justification for those who demand revolution is the
existing problems which are not being solved
seriously. Unfortunately, in most cases the answers
they provide are also the problems themselves. They
provide the solution by merely illustrating the
failure of the system to solve the existing problems.
That’s why their solution is: Replace the system.
The mindset
revolution
As
the mahaguru of management, Peter Drucker wrote,
“Productivity is attitude,” the solutions to our
nation’s problems cannot be found in the system, but
they are in our mind and attitude. Replacing power
and institutions and yet using essentially the same
qualities of attitude and mindset will not work. In
fact, we will be worse off since our domestic and
global environment keep changing.
Take
for example the case of building national unity.
Much
of concerns and debates on national unity have focused
on a territorial integrity issue. While it is
important, it however tends to sideline the most
important issue in realizing unity, the unity of
people. Facts have shown that achieving a territorial
unity does not guarantee a unity of people living
within the same territory. The breakdown of the former
Yugoslavia, where its territorial unity was
superficially imposed under the Tito’s regime, is an
example. Another example is the former Soviet Union
which was disintegrated in 1988 after experiencing an
imposed territorial unity for decades.
On
the other hand, a unity of people could lead to a
territorial unity. As Berlin Wall was collapsed in
1989, the territorial barrier between East and West
Germany crumbled, bringing the people of the two
countries into unity. To a greater extend, the sense
of unity among the people of Western Europe has
brought the region into European Union, not only by
tearing down geographical borders but also by bringing
the economy of 15 nations into one management which is
symbolized in one currency - Euro - and European
Monetary Union. They now share a common destiny of a
more prosperous Europe. As of today, a number of
Eastern European countries such as Poland, Rumania and
Latvia are in the process of joining the Union. Unity
among people brings territorial unity.
For
almost 30 years of repressive era of the New Order
regime, the Indonesian civil society cannot develop
itself properly. The superficially imposed unity
during the New Order regime had failed to stimulate
and energize closed inter-relationship among different
groups of people without worrying about the issue of
SARA (an acronym of ethnicity, religion, race and
social classes). Each element of SARA has been seen as
a potential cause for a violent conflict that could
lead to national disintegration, inducing people to
live in a constant anticipation that there might be
conflict driven by SARA. As a result, it had failed to
foster cooperation among people across various types
of diversity. And it certainly had failed to transform
diversity from challenge into opportunities which is a
necessary foundation in building a winning nation.
Indonesia is a very diverse nation. Economically and
politically, the nation is still in transition, from
economic crisis to recovery and from authoritative to
democracy. Given this reality, the need for unity is
even imperative more than any time in the history of
the nation. In building a unity of people, the
nations need a new paradigm in building unity. Rather
than centered on territorial, power and politics, the
new paradigm must be centered on people. And rather
than focus on human emotion, it must be focus on human
devotion and affection. I call this a mindset
revolution.
This
mindset revolution will challenge Indonesian people to
have a new way of viewing others, valuing life,
interacting with others, respecting others, building
solid and mutually beneficial communities and
developing winning attitudes. It begins by developing
an attitude that regards that all people –
whether they live in the African desert, the Middle
Eastern desert, the Latin American jungle, the
Kalimantan jungle or the crowded New York City – are
human beings, our neighbors, just like ourselves. This
may sound a trivial challenge but many problems today,
either domestically or internationally, are caused by
people’s attitude that tends to view different people
differently.
Next is by developing an attitude that
not only
respects differences - because biologically and
culturally people are always different – but also
considers others as an asset in building mutualism
cooperation. Ironically, although the founding fathers
had shown a wonderful example of the priceless of
cooperation in realizing a common goal, their
successors have failed miserably to follow their path.
The last three decades have witnessed how cooperation
had become a political commodity and people have
viewed it sarcastically. Cooperation becomes a joke.
Its invaluable nature – as
the essence of harmony and abundance –
has been buried in the joke.
The mindset revolution is aimed not
only at achieving national unity, but also at building
a winning nation. This is due to a simple reason that
is realizing national unity is not just for the sake
of unity, but for a greater purpose that is to make
Indonesia become a prosperous nation. Winning
individuals give birth to a winning nation.
But, how to build winning individuals?
Drucker points out to attitude.
Attitude is the way of
thinking or looking at things which determines how we
behave. Our actions are often a result of how we think
or feel towards people or situation which in turn
determine how we interact with others help us raise
our performance and productivity.
Quite
similarly, Ralph Waldo Emerson emphasizes the
importance of perception. As Emerson wrote, “Do
what you know and perception is converted into
character,” perception could finally become one’s
destiny.
No doubt, in most cases perception is
reality. When one perceives she will win a game, that
perception is transformed into power and subsequently
converted into action. Perception is often the single
factor that separates the losers from the winners. So,
building winning individuals – thus winning nation, is
essentially building a set of winning characters. And
building winning characters requires a mindset
revolution.
The next time you hear
someone shouts "We need a revolution", it's time to
remind him/her of the mindset revolution.
Your
comment
Back
to top
|