home

about us

mission

contact us

The Prospect is published by The Indonesian Institute. Our messages are study, democracy and unity.
 

 

MAIN ISSUES
 

Democracy

 

Economy

 

Labor/Unemployment

 

Education

 

Development

 

Global Issues

 

Research

 

Contact Us:

Elwin Tobing

Caution: A new kind of AIDS

A wrong prescription or a wrong direction?

A tale of two economic plans. So, who is to blame?

Tax and Expenditure Reforms, Instead of Subsidy Reduction

Why did Megawati Choose Unpopular and Bad Options?

Peace on Earth (2)

Peace on Earth (1)

What Megawati Should Do?

The New New World Order (2)

The Majority's Blunder

A Self-destructive Play or a Winning One

Fire and Ice

Promoting Dialog with a New Paradigm

Searching for Good Politicians (2)

Searching for Good Politicians (1)

Belajar Memahami Perbedaan

Internet and Knowledge Advancement

Information is not power

 


     Do and Don’t: A Little Advice to Fellow Indonesians

 

 

Wars begin in the minds of man, and in those minds, love and compassion would have built the defenses of peace.  U Thant

More than an end to war, we want an end to the beginnings of all wars. Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882 - 1945)

Freedom is not free. Martin Luther King

Peace is not an absence of war, it is a virtue, a state of mind, a disposition for benevolence, confidence, justice. Baruch Spinoza (1632 - 1677)

03/20/03

48 hours have passed and the war has begun.

Undoubtedly, just like many other people around the world, many Indonesians including politician elites, religious leaders and top government officials are against the use of force by the Coalition of the willing, led by the US, in resolving the crisis in Iraq. Certainly there is nothing wrong with it. And just like many other people who support the war, people should respect other people’s opinion and stance on this crisis. 

Some people view that the use of force should never be an option and opine that the inspection regime was showing positive results.  Therefore, if the inspection regime were given more time, it would be able to disarm Iraq peacefully. They also said that although the past behavior of Iraqi regime was very bad and although Iraq might have WMD such as chemical and biological weapons, Baghdad has not attacked any countries or used WMD during the last 12 years. The punch line of the argument is: Containment is working and it must be the only option.

Some other people perceive that the Iraqi regime poses an imminent threat to the international peace and security and are willing to justify the use of force in changing the regime in Iraq. Among their reasons are the violations of 17 United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions during the last 12 years, the possession of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and the historical behavior of Iraqi regime which had attacked two sovereign countries without warning and legitimate cause.  They view that the inspection regime would never be able to disarm Iraq because the lack cooperation of the Iraqi regime to disarm as demanded by the UNSC resolutions 687 in 1991 and 1441 in 2002. In addition, they argue that the Iraqi people have long been suffered under the current regime and the international community must take action. The bottom line: The Iraq’s disarmament is impossible and the Iraqi people will continue to be oppressed unless there is a regime change in Iraq.

The debate could continue forever but unfortunately no one can live forever. At some point in time, there has to be an end to any crisis. And in the current crisis in Iraq, although peace is infinitely preferred to war, sadly war is the only option left on the table. Mainly, it is because of the failure of Baghdad and the international community, including the UNSC, to come to a peaceful solution. Thanks to a little assurance from philosopher Baruch Spinoza who said more than three centuries ago that war is sometimes needed to achieve peace. It is our hope that there is peace waiting behind this war.

So, as peaceful and kind people, how Indonesians should react to the war in Iraq? More importantly, how Indonesian leaders, especially politician elites, legislative members and group leaders – all who can influence Indonesians’ perception about and reaction to the war- should react?

It is difficult not to attach some personal emotion to any war. But, in the difficult time, it is rationality, not emotion that often leads us into a better life.  Indonesian leaders, politicians and group leaders should react rationally, not emotionally to this war.

While we are free to reject the US-led war in Iraq, it is our responsibility to show respect to anyone. Disagreement should never justify irrational conducts including the ones that would worsen our already suffered nation. While we are free to sign petition and raise our voice to reject the war, it is our responsibility not to create any damaging actions that could worsen our domestic situation in Indonesia.

Clearly, the war in Iraq is not a war on religion. It is easy to imagine that there would be no war if we were able to return the clock back to the early of 1990. In August 1990, Iraq invaded Kuwait and then the UNSC adopted resolution 687 and 1441 on Iraqi disarmament.

As a part of global community, the first step toward building a peaceful world is to be a peaceful individual and to be a peaceful nation. Facts show that we still have to work hard to realize it.

 Your comment

Back to top

© 2002 The Prospect and The Indonesian Institute, All Rights Reserved.