One interesting statement was raised by an
Indonesian in the Internet discussion yahoogroups “apakabar”:
“The Indonesian politics is a bad politics”.
Curiously, is there any good politics?
Many people are uncomfortable talking about
politics. Either they hate, dislike or simply don’t
care about it. If one usually gives a spin answer
to a direct question, she might be labeled as
politician—a bad connotation.
People generally think of
politics as something bad, closely associated with
falsehood, lie and all other wicked acts purposely
done for private gains. As Ambrose Bierce once said,
“Politics is the conduct of public affairs for
private advantage."
They also view politics as something made up of
irrelevancies. When one hears someone else talks
about politics, in the back up of her mind is, “he
is talking something useless”. We commonly hear,
“stop talking politics!” or “politics? No, it’s just
a non-sense!” Even Bill Clinton, one of the most
skilled politicians in the US, said, “No wonder
Americans hate politics when, year in and year out,
they hear politicians make promises that won't come
true because they don't even mean them—campaign
fantasies that win elections but don't get nations
moving again.”
In other words, politics is becoming useless.
However, a closer look at politics reveals that it
is not as bad as one might have generally thought.
According to
Merriam-Webster’s dictionary, politics is (a)
the art or science of government, (b) the art or
science concerned with guiding or influencing
governmental policy, and (c) the art or science
concerned with winning and holding control over a
government.
Butler once wrote, “Politics is the art of the
possible.[1]
It can make impossibility becomes possible, like the
seemingly impossible Susilo Bambang Yudoyohono,
given the 8% of the votes that his party got in the
parliament election last year, to win overwhelming
votes in the presidential election because, partly,
the ability of his political campaigns to stress his
differences from the other candidate, Megawati. It
can also make the possibility becomes impossible,
like the possible President Megawati to be president
in 1999, but ended up becoming vice-president due to
the political maneuver of some politicians.
Politics actually does not need to be viewed so
negatively. The art of possibility can hold
together one of the most diverse nations on the
globe—Indonesia, counteracting the centrifugal
forces that can potentially tear the nation apart.
No matter how bad one views it, politics is still
necessary for a society to develop. It goes to the
fundamental question which has interested
philosophers since before the time of Plato:
How and who should organize society?
It is clear that human communities need some kind of
administrative and executive functionaries to
coordinate the gathering and distribution of
resources, physical and social resources, equitably
to all members of society. And political
work is the means the civilized world has for
deciding who and how the society should be
organized.
The truth is, the real problem is not politics.
Clinton said politics is becoming useless not
because it is a politics. It is becoming irrelevant
because “they” have made it so. Who are they? They
are the politicians. Many view politics as an art of
deceiving since they see politicians often mislead
people. Or it might be an art of lying as
politicians never tell the truth. Or it could be an
art of forgetting since politicians always forget
what they said. As
Charles De Gaulle once said,
"I have come to the conclusion that politics are too
serious a matter to be left to the politicians."
In the context of Indonesia, unfortunately De
Gaulle’s conclusion seems to be right. Corrupt and
incapable politicians have long dominated the
nation’s politics. Money politics now dictates most
political decision at every level. As a result,
people become so apathetic with politics and
politicians. Something must be done to prevent
further disinterest of the people in politics.
While
majority of the country’s politicians are not up to
the people’s expectation—either morally or
intellectually bankrupt, there is still a small
portion of them who are consistently working to
promote a better Indonesia.
Just as there is good and bad in everything, there
are good politicians and bad politicians. It is not
hard to accept this reality, but what is more
difficult is how to distinguish between them. So,
what is the difference between good and bad
politicians?
The difference rests in four alphabets: Bad
politicians often talk about poli-tics, while
good politicians often talk about poli-cy.
For bad politicians, politics is everything. They
come to power through politics, they defend their
power with politics and in most cases they “die”
because of politics. The order of their priority is
as follow: Politics, personality and policy. No
wonder, when it comes to a policy making process
they always politicizing it because they see policy
less important than politics.
Politics, when it is played by bad politicians will
end up just like what Dalton Camp remarked, “… is
made up largely of irrelevancies.”
[i]
R. A. Butler, 1971. ” The art of the possible:
The memoirs of Lord Butler” Gambit (1972).