home

about us

mission

contact us

The Prospect is published by The Indonesian Institute. Our messages are study, democracy and unity.
 

 

MAIN ISSUES
 

Democracy

 

Economy

 

Labor/Unemployment

 

Education

 

Development

 

Global Issues

 

Research

 

Contact Us:

Elwin Tobing

A wrong prescription or a wrong direction?

A tale of two economic plans. So, who is to blame?

Tax and Expenditure Reforms, Instead of Subsidy Reduction

Why did Megawati Choose Unpopular and Bad Options?

Peace on Earth (2)

Peace on Earth (1)

What Megawati Should Do?

The New New World Order (2)

The Majority's Blunder

A Self-destructive Play or a Winning One

Fire and Ice

Promoting Dialog with a New Paradigm

Searching for Good Politicians (2)

Searching for Good Politicians (1)

Belajar Memahami Perbedaan

Internet and Knowledge Advancement

Information is not power

 


The need for a strong vision and cooperation

 

part 2
 

 

 

 

 

 

Power consists in one's capacity to link his will with the purpose of others, to lead by reason and a gift of cooperation. Woodrow Wilson
 
The great thing in this world is not so much where you stand, as in what direction you are moving.  Oliver Wendell Holmes (1809 - 1894)

01/25/03

While the old saying goes, "United we are strong," it seems Indonesians these days embrace another philosophy, "United we get lost."

Having cooperatively “forced” the mighty Soeharto to resign – although various external forces also contributed to his decision to step down -, Indonesians are now in the brink of losing two of the most important factors in bringing the nation to a higher level. The first is vision and the other one is cooperation.

Vision will determine the ultimate goals that need to be achieved. It sets values that need to be obeyed and it keeps the fighting spirit in achieving the goals. In other words, vision is the goal, the guidance and the path.

But what kind of vision that Indonesians are almost losing? It can be answered by another question: What are the goals that Indonesians want to achieve? The Constitution clearly says: Prosperity and justice for all Indonesians. It does not say for a certain Indonesians, but for all.

The subsequent question is how to define and realize prosperity and justice for all?  The former cannot be kept abstract as abstractness will impede the efforts in realizing it. For instance, if prosperity is defined circularly as prosperity, as what is happening now, Indonesia will never be able to evaluate herself whether she makes progress or not.

To be concrete, let’s define that prosperity is the condition where 90-95% of Indonesians are able to afford good housing, good access to healthcare and sanitation and good education. The prosperity of the remaining 5-10% will be provided by the government. These are the conditions the nation wants to achieve in 20-25 years from now. The crucial questions now are: How to achieve them? What are the plans? What is the course of direction? How to build our human resources to perform the goals?

Neither the current government nor non-governmental organizations are able to produce such vision, to design plans and to set the direction that needs to be taken to achieve them.  The nation is basically losing a sense of direction.

Almost five years since Soeharto stepped down the country is still struggling to walk on her own. The nation apparently has to keep swallowing foreign debts and foreign assistances while at the same time is confused to find her own way to prosper. But sooner or later, this dismal condition has got to stop.  To solely rely on the lawmakers and the government to formulate the nation’s direction would be a mistake given the tendency that those two bodies are seemingly out of touch of these ideas as the House leader himself is acting as immune to the law and most lawmakers and government’s officials still need to improve their analytical capabilities.   

Together with the government, various elements in society – intellectuals, media people, business people and etc. - have to sit down and debate matters related to the future of the nation, from the nation’s goals, plans to achieve the goals and the direction to realize them. A simple idea would be to have a national summit this year on “Nation’s strategy and direction in realizing a better Indonesia.”  And all has to cooperate for a fundamental reason.

Cooperation is the effective way to realize the vision. It inherently implies a set of rules in achieving a particular goal. Some of them are: Tolerant, hard-working, honest and responsible. Any cooperation without tolerance will not work since cooperation demands an acknowledgement of others. The latter automatically recognizes that people are different and that diversity is natural.  

Since cooperation is directed to achieve goals, it demands hard-working attitude from individuals joint in the cooperation. Hard-working individuals are generally honest people since they usually accept the fact that they have weaknesses. They are also responsible people since they value time preciously and view responsibilities as opportunities to realize a higher level of achievement. It is no wonder when British philosopher, Bertrand Russell said, “The only thing that will redeem mankind is cooperation.”

Cooperation also will link one’s idealism to those of others. It will connect different people emotionally for the good of all. That’s why Bung Hatta, one of the foremost founding fathers of the nation, was very convinced that only by cooperation Indonesia would be able to achieve her independence and her greatness in the future.

Even power, when it is viewed objectively, is nothing but cooperation. When power is exercised without cooperation, it either becomes repressive and totalitarian or pathetic and ineffective. When power is emerged not by cooperation it becomes totalitarian. The former US President, Woodrow Wilson, precisely put this into a wonderful line, “Power consists in one's capacity to link his will with the purpose of others, to lead by reason and a gift of cooperation.”

One may ask, “So, what about MPR – Majelis Permusyarawatan Rakyat?” It is true that the above issues are political issues. But as Charles De Gaulle once said, “…politics are too serious a matter to be left to the politicians,” those crucial issues need to be debated and formulated by the whole elements in the society, not solely by politicians.

And to wait until the 2004 general election is over would be too late.

 

 Your comment

Back to top

© 2002 The Prospect and The Indonesian Institute, All Rights Reserved.